LOD Example - Revision history

Windwalkr at 08:40, 17 March 2013

2013-03-17T08:40:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 17 March 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:

	[[File:Distant LOD with normal map.png]]		[[File:Distant LOD with normal map.png]]



			==Downloads==
			* [[Media:LOD Example without normal map.cdp]]
			* [[Media:LOD Example with normal map.cdp]]

Windwalkr at 08:37, 17 March 2013

2013-03-17T08:37:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 17 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The following images seek to illustrate how LOD works and why the use of a normal map is important. Each image includes both a high-detail sphere (~10,000 polygons) and a low-detail sphere (~300 polygons.)		The following images seek to illustrate how [[Level of Detail\|LOD]] works and why the use of a [[normal map]] is important. Each image includes both a high-detail sphere (~10,000 polygons) and a low-detail sphere (~300 polygons.)


Line 5:		Line 5:
	The simplest approach to LOD is to just build a second model which maintains the same approximate silhouette as the original but significantly reduces the polygon count. In this example, the same diffuse texture is used for both models, and no normal map is applied. The screenshot was taken at a range which is clearly inappropriate for the low LOD- this is deliberate to illustrate the differences between the two models. Some points to observe:		The simplest approach to LOD is to just build a second model which maintains the same approximate silhouette as the original but significantly reduces the polygon count. In this example, the same diffuse texture is used for both models, and no normal map is applied. The screenshot was taken at a range which is clearly inappropriate for the low LOD- this is deliberate to illustrate the differences between the two models. Some points to observe:

	* The silhouette of the low-detail sphere has an obvious reduction in detail. The smooth curve of the original has given way to a somewhat jagged edge.		* The silhouette of the low-detail sphere (right) has an obvious reduction in detail. The smooth curve of the original has given way to a somewhat jagged edge.
	* The interior of the object also looks blocky as you can clearly see how the lighting changes with each polygon in the sphere.		* The interior of the object also looks blocky as you can clearly see how the lighting changes with each polygon in the sphere.

Line 13:		Line 13:

	== LOD with a normal map ==		== LOD with a normal map ==
	With a little extra effort, you can build a normal map from the high-detail object and apply it to the lower-detail version. This allows the object to be lit as if the missing detail was still present, improving the visual experience. The next screenshot is taken at a similar range to the previous example, but the use of a normal map substantially improves the quality of the result. You will note that while the edge lines are still jagged, the interior appears to be substantially higher in quality.		With a little extra effort, you can build a normal map from the high-detail object and apply it to the lower-detail version (left). This allows the object to be lit as if the missing detail was still present, improving the visual experience. The next screenshot is taken at a similar range to the previous example, but the use of a normal map substantially improves the quality of the result. You will note that while the edge lines are still jagged, the interior appears to be substantially higher in quality.

	[[File:Close LOD with normal map.png]]		[[File:Close LOD with normal map.png]]

Windwalkr at 08:31, 17 March 2013

2013-03-17T08:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 17 March 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* The interior of the object also looks blocky as you can clearly see how the lighting changes with each polygon in the sphere.		* The interior of the object also looks blocky as you can clearly see how the lighting changes with each polygon in the sphere.

	[[~~Media~~:Close LOD without normal map.png]]		[[File:Close LOD without normal map.png]]


Line 15:		Line 15:
	With a little extra effort, you can build a normal map from the high-detail object and apply it to the lower-detail version. This allows the object to be lit as if the missing detail was still present, improving the visual experience. The next screenshot is taken at a similar range to the previous example, but the use of a normal map substantially improves the quality of the result. You will note that while the edge lines are still jagged, the interior appears to be substantially higher in quality.		With a little extra effort, you can build a normal map from the high-detail object and apply it to the lower-detail version. This allows the object to be lit as if the missing detail was still present, improving the visual experience. The next screenshot is taken at a similar range to the previous example, but the use of a normal map substantially improves the quality of the result. You will note that while the edge lines are still jagged, the interior appears to be substantially higher in quality.

	[[~~Media~~:Close LOD with normal map.png]]		[[File:Close LOD with normal map.png]]


Line 21:		Line 21:
	Now let's take a look at the same object at a more reasonable distance. If you look closely, you can tell that the edges are not quite as smooth as the original- but it's acceptable for many purposes.		Now let's take a look at the same object at a more reasonable distance. If you look closely, you can tell that the edges are not quite as smooth as the original- but it's acceptable for many purposes.

	[[~~Media~~:Mid-range LOD with normal map.png]]		[[File:Mid-range LOD with normal map.png]]


Line 27:		Line 27:
	And at extreme range, it's really hard to spot any difference at all, despite the fact that the low detail model has only 3% of the original's polygon count.		And at extreme range, it's really hard to spot any difference at all, despite the fact that the low detail model has only 3% of the original's polygon count.

	[[~~Media~~:Distant LOD with normal map.png]]		[[File:Distant LOD with normal map.png]]

Windwalkr: Created page with "The following images seek to illustrate how LOD works and why the use of a normal map is important. Each image includes both a high-detail sphere (~10,000 polygons) and a low-..."

2013-03-17T08:31:00Z

Created page with "The following images seek to illustrate how LOD works and why the use of a normal map is important. Each image includes both a high-detail sphere (~10,000 polygons) and a low-..."

New page

The following images seek to illustrate how LOD works and why the use of a normal map is important. Each image includes both a high-detail sphere (~10,000 polygons) and a low-detail sphere (~300 polygons.)

== LOD without a normal map ==
The simplest approach to LOD is to just build a second model which maintains the same approximate silhouette as the original but significantly reduces the polygon count. In this example, the same diffuse texture is used for both models, and no normal map is applied. The screenshot was taken at a range which is clearly inappropriate for the low LOD- this is deliberate to illustrate the differences between the two models. Some points to observe:

* The silhouette of the low-detail sphere has an obvious reduction in detail. The smooth curve of the original has given way to a somewhat jagged edge.
* The interior of the object also looks blocky as you can clearly see how the lighting changes with each polygon in the sphere.

[[Media:Close LOD without normal map.png]]

== LOD with a normal map ==
With a little extra effort, you can build a normal map from the high-detail object and apply it to the lower-detail version. This allows the object to be lit as if the missing detail was still present, improving the visual experience. The next screenshot is taken at a similar range to the previous example, but the use of a normal map substantially improves the quality of the result. You will note that while the edge lines are still jagged, the interior appears to be substantially higher in quality.

[[Media:Close LOD with normal map.png]]

Now let's take a look at the same object at a more reasonable distance. If you look closely, you can tell that the edges are not quite as smooth as the original- but it's acceptable for many purposes.

[[Media:Mid-range LOD with normal map.png]]

And at extreme range, it's really hard to spot any difference at all, despite the fact that the low detail model has only 3% of the original's polygon count.

[[Media:Distant LOD with normal map.png]]