Talk:HowTo/Build T:ANE Track: Difference between revisions

From TrainzOnline
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "I believe that the latest procedural track, build 74539, doesn't have the half sleeps and half chairs any more. In my trials, I always used the older way of starting each mesh..."
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I believe that the latest procedural track, build 74539, doesn't have the half sleeps and half chairs any more. In my trials, I always used the older way of starting each mesh halfway between sleepers. At first I inserted a hidden mesh underneath the sleepers and chairs to account for the actual distance but the new tags "spacing-length-before" and "spacing-length-after" seem to take care of that. Haven't discovered what the new tag "padding-length" does yet.
I believe that the latest procedural track, build 74539, doesn't have the half sleeps and half chairs any more. --[[User:Pcas1986|pcas1986]] ([[User talk:Pcas1986|talk]]) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)
 
: It doesn't. Don't make track like this with the half sleepers - changing from one track type to another doesn't work properly if you do make half sleepers. --[[User:Jamesmoody|Jamesmoody]] ([[User talk:Jamesmoody|talk]]) 17:23, 4 May 2015 (AEST)
 
In my trials, I always used the older way of starting each mesh halfway between sleepers. --[[User:Pcas1986|pcas1986]] ([[User talk:Pcas1986|talk]]) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)
 
: This is what we use now also. I would advise against following this document as it exists. Our document will show different methods and alignments for nearly every component. --[[User:Jamesmoody|Jamesmoody]] ([[User talk:Jamesmoody|talk]]) 17:23, 4 May 2015 (AEST)
 
At first I inserted a hidden mesh underneath the sleepers and chairs to account for the actual distance but the new tags "spacing-length-before" and "spacing-length-after" seem to take care of that. Haven't discovered what the new tag "padding-length" does yet.
 
I have noticed some changes but am reluctant to make any changes to the tutorial just yet.  Basically I'm waiting for N3V to publish some information.
--[[User:Pcas1986|pcas1986]] ([[User talk:Pcas1986|talk]]) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)

Latest revision as of 07:23, 4 May 2015

I believe that the latest procedural track, build 74539, doesn't have the half sleeps and half chairs any more. --pcas1986 (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)

It doesn't. Don't make track like this with the half sleepers - changing from one track type to another doesn't work properly if you do make half sleepers. --Jamesmoody (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2015 (AEST)

In my trials, I always used the older way of starting each mesh halfway between sleepers. --pcas1986 (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)

This is what we use now also. I would advise against following this document as it exists. Our document will show different methods and alignments for nearly every component. --Jamesmoody (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2015 (AEST)

At first I inserted a hidden mesh underneath the sleepers and chairs to account for the actual distance but the new tags "spacing-length-before" and "spacing-length-after" seem to take care of that. Haven't discovered what the new tag "padding-length" does yet.

I have noticed some changes but am reluctant to make any changes to the tutorial just yet. Basically I'm waiting for N3V to publish some information. --pcas1986 (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (AEST)